Ecclesiastical Freemasons vs real Catholics


(a) Neither those in Heaven nor those in Hell have ever related to me about the Second Vatican Council being somehow “invalid”. At the same, neither those in Heaven nor those in Hell ever affirmed the Second Vatican Council to be “valid” either. Nor have I ever inquired about this matter specifically. Perhaps I shall inquire of God to permit me His Own Testament concerning this Council, if His Will permits, since it seems more and more worthy of a solemn Inquisition.

(b) Those in Heaven and those in Hell have both communicated to the Church on earth concerning the abuses and sins committed within the Second Vatican Council and those which followed the Second Vatican Council, on the part of the hierarchy, and about the (their words) “odious” New Mass. They have also unanimously vindicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. They have also communicated thus to the wider world, to whom the Church was set apart by the Christ of God to bear the continuity of His Light for its salvation. This is something of the Truth which the Vatican prelature (and hierarchy of the Catholic Church at large) seems to have dreadfully misplaced – in the same way, king Solomon had given himself and the kingdom over to the whims of the demon-worshipping concubines he fantasized sharing a bed with, and then actualized taking to himself in ritual so that he could claim to be lawfully bedding them out of necessity… (Think any of you that God was deceived about the Assisi “exchange” in 1988 or anything prior to and since then?)
I wish to honor the sentiments given to me directly by Our Lady as Coredemptrix, Mediatrix of all grace, and Queen of the Cosmos. To Her Immaculate Maternal Heart, Pope Francis is “My son”. I choose to abstain from answering this question according to the questionnaire’s terms. I call him “Pope Francis” as a matter of formality, and pray for him as such. Nuances of what would constitute a “valid” or “invalid” papacy are, at least for now, suspended from me by God as much as by man (and the Modernists who have robbed me and countless others of our right to an authentic Catholic education – mark my words following, God will not be mocked).
If you wish me to answer this with a yes or no, first you must tell me what was ever dogmatically declared in those “documents of the Second Vatican Council” (your words, simply). You don’t get to declare something a “fact” and receive my submission just because you call it a fact. That’s stupid and hair-brained; your fault, not mine.
I think that whoever put this question together is in error and that the question itself deserves subjected to round mockery. The Magisterium of the Catholic Church is the only Magisterium that exists. Popes do not have the privilege to claim “Magisteriums” of their very own. There is no “Magisterium of the Popes”. Those who tried that, who have tried to declare something heretical “ex cathedra” have fallen dead before they could succeed. In the midst of our current Pontiff making such bold declarations in texts, and pressing everyone to get on board with whatever he says, he has never once declared any of those things “ex cathedra”. Why not? Does he perhaps shrewdly “know better” than to do something that would immediately incite God to jealousy for the Bride of Christ and cancel his life and what he is trying to do? Or does he not “know better” that we Laity are not quite as much ignoramuses as all that? Or is he being led blind by the hand like a little puppet by a core enemy of the Church who is being concealed in the walls of the Vatican? Is his Motu Proprio, “Traditionis Custodes,” yet another smokescreen? Each of these questions waits the revelation of the Truth, because Christ’s explicit command was:

“Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.”
Matthew 28:19-20 

Leia mais em:
When the Diocesan Bishop is faithful to Christ, yes, he is the moderator, promoter, and guardian of the liturgical life of the Church in the diocese entrusted to him. When he is not faithful to Christ, he is neither of these things. Pretty straightforward, wouldn’t you say? (Just remember… Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever… The God who reigns over the whole universe is “pre-Vatican II” also.)
Suggestions/thoughts? How considerate of you. Beware of doing the Antichrist’s works and those of the Anti-Church. Beware of your becoming the stewards Our Lord speaks of when He warns of the fate of those who indulge in every vice and further abuse the servants and the children of God in their midst. You are neither King nor Master here or anywhere. You are Princes, not to be “of this world” but “of that world without end” which is sublimely greater and far higher exalted than this one.

“And the Lord said: Who (thinkest thou) is the faithful and wise steward, whom his lord setteth over his family, to give them their measure of wheat in due season? Blessed is that servant, whom when his lord shall come, he shall find so doing. Verily I say to you, he will set him over all that he possesseth.
But if that servant shall say in his heart: My lord is long a coming; and shall begin to strike the menservants and maidservants, and to eat and to drink and be drunk: The lord of that servant will come in the day that he hopeth not, and at the hour that he knoweth not, and shall separate him, and shall appoint him his portion with unbelievers.
And that servant who knew the will of his lord, and prepared not himself, and did not according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.
But he that knew not, and did things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes.
And unto whomsoever much is given, of him much shall be required: and to whom they have committed much, of him they will demand the more.
I am come to cast fire on the earth; and what will I, but that it be kindled?”
Luke, 12:42-49 – Bíblia Católica Online

Leia mais em:
This document was leaked from out of state by a traditional Catholic, to a mutual friend, who then passed it along to me so that I may enjoy playing with it at the Bishops’ and Vatican’s expense. That’s right, we see what you’re up to, New One World Religionists. The Pope is not an absolute monarch, he is a PRINCE and the chief steward – chief of the Princes. There is only ever and will only ever be ONE King, only ONE Master – that is Jesus, Christ the King. And the King is offended that you are persecuting those who love Him and who embrace and meet Him and His Cross in the Truest Christian Identity Rite of Holy Mass in the history of the Life of the Church on earth.

In the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ,

Meghan Fry

Published by endallwar8894

Just a little Catholic living a hidden multidimensional life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: